Jordan Crane’s NON #5
NON - the anthology that took the best of what made Françoise Mouly and Art Spiegelman’s RAW a classic and combined it with a clear sense of where the future of comics lay.
Take a look at the beautiful anthology, NON #5.
What you’re looking at is a die-cut cardboard container holding three separate perfect bound comics all within a hand-silkscreened cover.
Put out in 2001, this baby is the way it is out of necessity.
From Crane in 2008:
NON #5 is definitely a little different than all the rest of them. NON #5 took that shape because it had to. That was the only way to collect it all together. I was originally going to have Col-Dee and [Kurt Wolfgang’s graphic novella] Where Hats Go in the [main NON] book. That was the original plan. But then Kurt and I got Xeric Grants to print them and we were able to overlap projects, which theoretically would save me money. It would’ve been a hell of a lot cheaper just to print the book as one big book, now that I look back on the whole thing. Those Xeric Grants were actually a hindrance. I was like, “Thanks for the $8,000 that ended up costing me $5,000.” [Laughs] Since those were Xeric Grant books, I wanted them to be a part of the package, but they had to work separately because they were going to be sold separately as well.
So that was my solution to that problem: I looked at the budget constraints of the book and tried to figure out how to make it as cheaply as possible. “How can we make it and still turn a profit?” It was just accepting the constraints and not being like, “I’m going to push my publisher to spend money that they don’t have.” In one way the form isn’t the point. In the biggest way the form isn’t the point. It’s about working within those constraints and creating the most high-quality work that is possible. It’s giving the proper attention to creating a book.
NON is worth thinking about because of the way it records the dawning “age of the anthology” in the United States.
During NON’s publication run, (1997-2001), there was a ton of work being made by many forward thinking cartoonists that wasn’t seeing the light of day. NON gave those artists exposure.
In a way, NON was really easy. It was a bunch of very obvious choices, because all these great guys were not being published. I was like a kid in a candy store. It was not a hard anthology to edit.
- Crane during an interview with Sean T. Collins.
Sure, it wasn’t hard for Crane to choose the best material, but the fact that it wasn’t hard to choose the material didn’t mean Crane was going to take a backseat to the process. Crane’s laboring over the overall design choices kept the whole publication astoundingly cohesive.
So, why no more NON? Well, today’s world of contemporary comics seems to find itself in a milieu steeped with anthologies full of rich contributions and high production value.
It’s a trend that has become a strong current in the past ten years and that at the time of NON #5′s publication, Crane could already see coming. Today you’ve got Harkham’s Kramer’s Ergot, Fantagraphics’MOME, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s Best American Comics, Nobrow … that’s a lot of beautiful anthologies coming out regularly and that’s without me counting the vast sea of selfpublished minicomics anthologies.
Given the healthy state of anthologies, let’s look back to NON #5. Who was the contributing crew?
- Mat Brinkman
- Dave Kiersch
- Greg Cook
- Megan Kelso
- Ron Regé Jr.
- Teven Weisman
- Paul Lyons
- James Kochalka
- Paul Pope
- Nick Bertozzi
- Brian Chippendale
- Brian Biggs
- Tom Devlin
- Brian Ralph
- Ulf K.
- David Choe
- Kurt Wolfgang
- Jordan Crane.
Many of these fine folks were being published by Tom Devlin’s Highwater Books at the time.
So, what do I love about NON #5?
Let’s start off with Mat Brinkman’s illustrations that punctuate the whole reading experience. His work elicits immediate laughter and provides a solid counterpoint to the rest of the stories. They give each story the breathing room it needs in order to be experienced satisfyingly. Whenever I make an anthology, I’m sure as shooting going to use this technique.
And my favorite contribution? Hands down, Pshaw. Pshaw’s lively cartooning was the biggest hidden treat. The only other time that I’d come across his work was in a comicscomics newsprint publication that ComicsComics had put out a while back. It was when I’d discovered the Picturebox crew and was still unfamiliar with what they were all about, but for some reason, the Pshaw strips that were printed really resonated with me. They were truly rad.
Besides, Pshaw’s short little ditty, Kurt Wolfgang’s wordless novella, Where Hats Go was a delight. It had me physically feeling the tangling plot. It was a borderline synesthetic experience for me. The ups and downs in the pantomime were felt with an immediate intensity that I rarely feel when words are included.
This deceptively simple comic tells the story of a young boy in search of his grandfather’s hat, a cherished link to the man & all the memories associated with him. The artwork is dense, filled with detail, but it never becomes too busy or confusing.
I was thoroughly impressed by Wolfgang’s capacity to put me in a headspace that was just a couple steps away from my traditional headspace of verbal communication. One reads the Where Hats Go and halfway in, as the story is catapulting forward, the reader realizes that not a single word has been read and yet the whole story is grasped.
Where Hats Go, sees Wolfgang work a really solid arc and includes several nice plot twists, along with a truly satisfying open ended final frame. I’m a sucker for heartwarming wordless stories (Set to Sea, Last Lonely Saturday), so the fact that I loved this that much isn’t too surprising.
Lot’s of great things in here that speak to the state of American independent cartooning circa 2001 and well worth experiencing first hand.
There was a review of NON #5 in the Comics Journal #240 in 2001, but given that access to that information is only available to suscribers of TCJ, I thought that illuminating on the details of this gem of a publication would be good to have on the web. If anything I’d like y’all to see what a beautiful collection Crane put together.
If you want to learn more about Jordan Crane or a more detailed telling of how NON #5 came to be the beautiful beast that it is, be sure to read Sean T. Collins’ 2008 interview with Crane.
20 Notes/ Hide
- snakesanddaggers likes this
- giveafuck-takeafuck likes this
- domitille-collardey likes this
- jesselucas likes this
- jeweledhouse reblogged this from dogcitypress
- kkoktu likes this
- bowielovesbeyonce likes this
- brendantheblob likes this
- tieduptight reblogged this from dogcitypress
- tieduptight likes this
- indie-dwelms likes this
- cigarlovespipe likes this
- laurellynnleake likes this
- swrd-play likes this
- kickstandkids reblogged this from dogcitypress and added:
- rebusbooks likes this
- fantagraphics likes this
- dummarodum likes this
- crinklesnsmudges reblogged this from dogcitypress
- stinckers reblogged this from dogcitypress
- dogcitypress posted this